Welcome to the New World Order, Cliven

"You just have to love the irony. Maybe MSNBC will give Clive Bundy his own show."
--Allen West

So, Allen West:



Who got permission to become a politician from The Jesuit Order, is attacking Al Sharpton:



Who answers to the same masters.

All in an effort to make white folks angry, and they are falling for it.

read comments here:
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10152674256051729&set=a.424759776728.200909.22067606728&type=1&theater

I've already shown how this man, Cliven Bundy, got himself into this mess.

http://globalistnews.blogspot.com/2014/04/is-land-grab-in-nevada-about-harry-reid.html

He owes money for land that does not belong to him, and he has owed it for 20 years.

=======================

First off, Al Sharpton works for The CFR/Elite/Jesuits, whatever you want to call them, he's not like me.
Second, he's always owed money:

Sharpton owes nearly $1.5 million in back taxes
U.S. attorney delves into unflappable civil rights leader's non-profit group

Sharpton has been investigated before
In 1990, he was acquitted of tax fraud and charges that he stole from one of his charities. He followed that up with what was essentially another victory in a tax case by pleading guilty to a misdemeanor charge of failing to file a state return.

more here:
http://www.nbcnews.com/id/24545747/ns/us_news-crime_and_courts/t/sharpton-owes-nearly-million-back-taxes

=====

Rev. Al deep in the red
By Isabel VincentDecember 11, 2011 | 5:00am

The Rev. Al Sharpton’s nonprofit paid him nearly $242,000 — even as it carried $1.6 million in debt, according to documents obtained by The Post.

In all, the controversial activist and his empire, including the National Action Network and two for-profit companies, were $5.3 million in the red, public records show.

Most of NAN’s money woes stemmed from more than $880,000 in unpaid federal payroll taxes, interest and penalties. It also paid more than $100,000 to settle two lawsuits, byproducts of the unpaid bills.

And it still owed $206,252 in loans to Sharpton’s for-profit Bo-Spanky Consulting Inc. and Sharpton Media LLC, the records show.

Sharpton drew a $241,732 salary and perks that included first-class or charter air travel, tax filings show. He owes the IRS $2.6 million in income tax, and nearly $900,000 in state tax.

The defunct Rev-Al Communications Inc. owes the state almost $176,000, and Bo-Spanky is $3,500 behind on state-tax liens.

more here:
http://nypost.com/2011/12/11/rev-al-deep-in-the-red/#ixzz1gF2I9z7u

====================================

Feds drop criminal probe of Rev. Al Sharpton's finances
Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 12:43 AM



Federal prosecutors have dropped their criminal probe of fiscal irregularities and tax fraud by the Rev. Al Sharpton and his National Action Network.

Lawyers for the civil rights activist said that means Sharpton's tax tangle won't result in an indictment or jail time, or even an appearance before a grand jury, though he's agreed to pay millions in back taxes.

It also means the feds aren't pursuing allegations the civil rights leader extorted contributions from corporations in exchange for not protesting against them.

Prosecutors would not comment, but law enforcement sources confirmed that the criminal probe is over.

Bottom line: Sharpton gets a huge, hearty laugh at the expense of his large and vocal chorus of critics and accusers.

more here:
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/feds-drop-criminal-probe-rev-al-sharpton-finances-article-1.351134

====================================

more on Cliven Bundy and the timeline of events:

Everything you need to know about the long fight between Cliven Bundy and the federal government

    By Jaime Fuller   
    April 15 at 12:20 pm

Updated at 2:15 p.m.

The case of cattle rancher Cliven Bundy burst into the national news cycle over the past week, captivating conservative media outlets with its protagonist, a firm believer of states' right with an armed group of supporters backing him. The stand-off between Nevada rancher and federal government officials trying to push cattle off of protected federal land has paused for now, but officials plan to renew their efforts soon.

This most-recent skirmish is only the latest in a decades-long fight between the federal government and Cliven Bundy, however.  Here's a timeline that proves just how complicated this case is — as well as the power that the media still retains to elevate a local political issue into a national one.

1989: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service lists the desert tortoise as an endangered species. A year later, its designation was changed to "threatened."

March 1993: The Washington Post publishes a story about the federal government's efforts to protect the desert tortoise in Nevada. Near Las Vegas, the Bureau of Land Management designated hundreds of thousands of acres of federal land for strict conservation efforts. "Among the conservation measures required," according to the Post's coverage, "are the elimination of livestock grazing and strict limits on off-road vehicle use in the protected tortoise habitat. Two weeks ago, the managers of the plan completed the task of purchasing grazing privileges from cattle ranchers who formerly used BLM land."

Many people were not impressed by the new conservation plan. "Cliven Bundy, whose family homesteaded his ranch in 1877 and who accuses the government of a 'land grab,' are digging in for a fight and say they will not willingly sell their grazing privileges to create another preserve." People who use the desert to prospect for minerals and to race motorcycles and jeeps also feel shortchanged. "'It was shoved down our throat,' said Mark Trinko, who represents off-road vehicle users on the committee that oversees the plan."

Bundy has repeatedly been fined for grazing his cattle on the protected land, fines he has not paid since 1993. The Bureau of Land Management, which oversees about 800 grazing areas in Nevada, responded by revoking his permit. Bundy has not applied for a new one.

more here:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2014/04/15/everything-you-need-to-know-about-the-long-fight-between-cliven-bundy-and-the-federal-government/

=====

Cliven Bundy and BLM: 10 things to know


By ADAM SNEED | 4/15/14 9:45 PM EDT Updated: 4/16/14 7:06 AM EDT

Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy has reignited the debate about federal power and states’ rights: When the Bureau of Land Management seized nearly 400 cattle belonging to Bundy for grazing on federal land without a permit, protesters gathered in a remote part of Clark County, Nev., to show their support for the rancher. Protesters reportedly appeared with weapons and briefly shut down part of Interstate 15, and federal agents used a stun gun on Bundy’s son.

Citing rising tension, BLM agreed to return the cattle, but the government says the situation is far from over. As the situation continues, here are 10 things to know about Bundy Ranch, BLM and the politics of federal land ownership:

1. Bundy has been fighting BLM for more than 20 years. The rancher hasn’t paid the BLM’s grazing fees since 1993, and a federal judge first ordered him to remove his cattle from the land in 1998. In July, another judge said the BLM could remove his cattle if it was still on public land by the end of August. Bundy says he owes the government more than $300,000 in unpaid fees, but the government says he owes $1 million, plus the cost of the recent round-up. Either way, Bundy tells the Las Vegas Sun that he won’t pay.

2. The Bundy family has owned its ranch since the 1870s. The ranch is only about 160 acres, which isn’t enough space to sustain the hundreds of cattle that Bundy owns. He insists the disputed land around his ranch belongs to the state of Nevada, rather than the federal government, and he says the feds have no authority in the area. He told the Sun the government is trying to sabotage his plans to someday turn the ranch over to his son.

3. Bundy doesn’t recognize the federal government. Speaking to conservative radio host Dana Loesch last week, he said he believes in a “sovereign state of Nevada” and abides by all state laws, but, “I don’t recognize the United States government as even existing.” (As The Atlantic notes, the Nevada Constitution says a citizen’s first allegiance is to the federal government.)

4. Environmentalists are also slamming the BLM over Bundy Ranch.
5. BLM is in charge of 245 million acres of public land nationwide.
6. The federal government owns more than 81 percent of all land in Nevada.
7. Bundy’s supporters have roots in the Sagebrush Rebellion.
8. Harry Reid was against it then, too.
9. The Federal Aviation Administration established a no-fly zone over Bundy Ranch.
10. The Bundys have received more than $2,000 in donations.

read here:
http://www.politico.com/story/2014/04/cliven-bundy-bureau-of-land-management-10-things-to-know-105735.html

====================================

No, it's not a fair.
It's not even relevant.

Al Sharpton, like Maddoff, and others, are part of the Elite.
He's just as puppet as Obama, Clinton, and the like:



Cliven Bundy, is just another sucker that thinks the law is on his side.

UPDATE:

YES, this is who they send when you act a fool about money you owe:


https://www.facebook.com/theblacksphere.net/photos/a.10150574031087596.370329.49867377595/10152054937747596/?type=1&theater


I mean really.