Throughout Donald Trump’s campaign, it became clear that several people in the entertainment industry predicted that Donald Trump would run for President.
The Daily Beast:
There’s a very specific analog between Biff Tannen, the bully and bad guy in almost every timeline in Back to the Future Part II, and a certain political figure who is rather popular in the United States right now. He’s been handed the keys to fortune, he’s unrepentantly used that fortune exclusively for himself, and he’s even become a public advocate for plastic surgery for women in his family.
It is not hard to put two and two together.
So, Bob Gale—writer of Back to the Future Part II and man who helped predict the IMAX theater and the self-checkout line—in these past few months, were you thinking what we’re all thinking?
“We thought about it when we made the movie! Are you kidding?” he says. “You watch Part II again and there’s a scene where Marty confronts Biff in his office and there’s a huge portrait of Biff on the wall behind Biff, and there’s one moment where Biff kind of stands up and he takes exactly the same pose as the portrait? Yeah.”
Of course, in the movie, Biff uses the profits from his 27-story casino (the Trump Plaza Hotel, completed in 1984, is 37 floors, by the way) to help shake up the Republican Party, before eventually assuming political power himself, helping transform Hill Valley, California, into a lawless, dystopian wasteland, where hooliganism reigns, dissent is quashed, and wherein Biff encourages every citizen to call him “America’s greatest living folk hero.”
“Yeah,” says Gale. “That’s what we were thinking about.”
Of course, in Back to the Future Part II, Marty McFly and Doc Brown fix it all just in the nick of time. They save themselves and America from Donald Tr… Biff Tannen.
Now, today, Marty and Doc are here to deliver the rest.
Today is the Future.
BEN COLLINS 10.21.15 1:39 AM ET
The following is from the Washington Post on Doonesbury predicting Trump with a level of accuracy that is almost Prophetic:
It was 1987 when Trump took out an ad — more precisely, a full-page “open letter from Donald J. Trump” — in several newspapers, including The Washington Post. The letter, for which he spent nearly six figures, said that “the world is laughing at American politicians.” Trump threw around words like “catastrophe” and “disaster” to describe what awaited the United States if the nation did not right its political course.
Trump was already floating political trial balloons. “I believe that if I did run for president, I’d win,” he told the New York Times that November, even as he denied a run.
By September of that year, Trudeau — who self-identifies as a member of “the ridicule industry” — was already satirizing Trump’s political journey.
The Donald has joked that “Trump: The Art of the Deal” is his second favorite book, after the Bible. And upon announcing his candidacy last June, he said, “I will be the greatest jobs president that God ever created.”
Trudeau views such utterances as “big, honking hubris” — which is why, in March 1989, he unspooled a storyline in which Trump hires a painter to render him as God-like. The result draws inspiration from the Sistine Chapel, but Trump wants his selfie masterpieces to hang instead over the toilets on his golden yacht.
In 1989, 15 years before “The Apprentice” debuted, “Doonesbury” had the real-estate mogul entering the world of reality TV and game shows. After this strip appeared, Trump would go on to work with beauty pageants in the ’90s and own the Miss Universe pageant by the middle of that decade.
Just who is calling on Donald Trump’s behalf? The Washington Post reported last month that Trump used to masquerade as his own publicist, making calls on his own behalf using several pseudonyms. This 1990 “Doonesbury” strip has fun with the notion that it may or may not be The Donald at the other end of the line.
Trump’s rhetoric — be it about towers or fingers or poll numbers — is rather obsessed with measurement and proportion. That’s no “yuge” revelation. But it’s interesting to see that fact stated so directly back in 1997, and then again from the presidential stump just two years later.
Looking back, it seems inevitable now that Trump’s self-descriptions as a sexually dynamic being would make for much-repeated sound bites in the current campaign. Some things, we just can’t unhear.
“Never licensed as a school, Trump University was in reality a series of real estate workshops in hotel ballrooms around the country, not unlike many other for-profit self-help or motivational seminars,” The Washington Post wrote last September, as criticism of Trump University began to rear its capped head again. “Though short-lived, it remains a thorn in Trump’s side nearly five years after its operations ceased.”
Back in 2005, “Doonesbury” was already having fun at Trump U’s expense — making Trudeau one of the lucky ones who actually came out on the plus side of that educational transaction.
The Washington Post reported this week that the Reagan White House dealt with Trump and his “large ego” rather warily. In 2007, “Doonesbury” imagined how Trump might try to engage another wary Republican White House for his own benefit.
Several months into his candidacy last summer, Trump was already knocking fellow GOP candidate Rand Paul about everything from his looks to his coffers to his golf game. Just four years earlier, in “Doonesbury,” Trump took a similar belittling tone toward papa Ron Paul.
This year, we’ve seen what it looks and sounds like to have former governor Sarah Palin stumping for Trump. Five years ago, “Doonesbury” offered a different take on the stagecraft of that same teaming.
A year ago this month, Trump announced his presidential bid. About 10 weeks prior to that, a Sunday “Doonesbury” coyly teased that very Trump announcement.
Interview with Garry Trudeau:
An episode of the Simpsons aired in 2000, showing Donald Trump as President.
‘Bart to the Future, first aired on 19 March 2000.’
As reported by the Guardian:
It was intended, according to its creator, as a “warning to America”, a horrifying and fantastical vision of the future in which the US – ludicrously – had elected as its president Donald Trump.
But with the property billionaire now the favourite to gain the Republican nomination for the presidency, the episode of The Simpsons that in 2000 foresaw such a laughable outcome has begun looking unnervingly prescient.
“As you know, we’ve inherited quite a budget crunch from President Trump,” Lisa – who describes herself as “America’s first straight, female president” – tells her advisers from behind her Oval Office desk. “How bad is it? The country is broke? How can it be?”
The episode, broadcast almost exactly 16 years ago on 19 March 2000, saw Bart offered a vision of his future in which he is a beer-swilling bum, while his sister Lisa has become president, following Trump’s time in office.
“As you know, we’ve inherited quite a budget crunch from President Trump,” Lisa – who describes herself as “America’s first straight, female president” – tells her advisers from behind her Oval Office desk. “How bad is it? The country is broke? How can it be?”
The previous regime, she is told, made the mistake of “investing in our nation’s children … The balanced breakfast programme just created a generation of ultra-strong supercriminals. And midnight basketball just taught them to function without sleep.”
Bart’s vision, he is told, is 30 years in the future, which would mean Trump is hoping to claim the White House either six or ten years ahead of Greaney’s prediction - depending on whether his fictional counterpart serves one or two terms in the White House.
He told the Hollywood Reporter, “The important thing is that Lisa comes into the presidency when America is on the ropes and that is the condition left by the Trump presidency. What we needed was for Lisa to have problems that were beyond her fixing, that everything went as bad as it possibly could, and that’s why we had Trump be president before her.”
The Simpsons, he said, “has always kind of embraced the over-the-top side of American culture … and [Trump] is just the fulfilment of that.”
In a separate brief animation, released by the Simpsons broadcaster Fox in July, Homer is paid to attend a Trump campaign rally (“Do you care who the next president is? No? Come with me”), where he is captured by rogue fronds of Trump’s puzzling hairstyle before being dragged off by two security guards. The presidential candidate’s podium slogan reads: “America, you can be my ex-wife!”
What we have here is a man that is not only trained by a Freemason in New Age doctrine to which he adheres to, but he graduated from a Jesuit College. Trump is friends with the very people he's running against, the Clintons. He was closed friends with a Lawyer that represented the Mob and Archdiocese, AKA the Catholic Church. He’s connected to Soros, Kissinger, Haas and Wall Street Bankers. He’s a proven Globalist that has made billions off of the very poor people he claims to want to help.
On top of all of that, Hollywood knew he would at least run for President.
If this we're Obama or Hillary, would the GOP/Conservative/Alt-Right/Alex Jones crowd still support him?
Remember what we said in the beginning, the Elite Externalize and Recruit via:
- Masonic Lodges - Fraternities, He was taught by a 3 Degree Freemason: Norman Vincent Peele
- Churches - Religion: Norman Vincent Peele
- Education - Schools: Trump is a Jesuit Educated, Ivy League Business man.
If the answer is not a resounding ‘No’ in your mind, read the documentation provided once more. The answer is painfully clear:
We’d make our own prediction.
We don’t even know if the Elite have decided to have President Obama not leave the White House as predicted by the Conspiracy crowd.
Looks like it was the other way around.
No matter who won, the Agenda would move forward regardless.
We really won’t know who’s really President until that person is sworn in during the Inauguration on January 20, 2017.
However, there is a at least one logical reason for allowing Donald Trump to run the kind of unprecedented campaign he’s been running?
Election 2016: Epilogue
http://globalistnews.blogspot.com/2016/11/election-2016-epilogue.html
Election 2016: Epilogue
http://globalistnews.blogspot.com/2016/11/election-2016-epilogue.html
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.