Attaching a Lunar Eclipse "Blood Moon" to Prophecy is Stupid

UPDATE to:

The Blood Moon Watch is a Theory
http://globalistnews.blogspot.com/2014/04/the-blood-moon-watch-is-theory.html

Revelation of John 6:12
"And I beheld when he had opened the sixth seal, and, lo, there was a great earthquake; and the sun became black as sackcloth of hair, and the moon became as blood;"The earthquake happens, then the sky is covered in volcanic ash.

Revelation of John 8:12
"And the fourth angel sounded, and the third part of the sun was smitten, and the third part of the moon, and the third part of the stars; so as the third part of them was darkened, and the day shone not for a third part of it, and the night likewise. "

This darkness and the moon being red (like blood) is significant only after the Fourth Angel has sounded.

It clearly says the "Day of the Lord" in both Joel 2:13 and Acts 2:20, which is a time frame.

So, using the moon being red now, is like setting dates, in a round about way.

Wednesday's lunar eclipse will create a 'blood' moon




more here:
http://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/2014/10/06/lunar-eclipse-blood-moon-wednesday/16810903/

comments:
https://www.facebook.com/usatoday/posts/10152300570450667

There's a difference between a lunar eclipse and the prophecy in Revelation.