Thursday, November 20, 2014

Immigration Reform - We've seen this Movie before

What's the difference between Republicans and Democrats?

Nothing.

===========================================

Did George H.W. Bush really pave the way for Obama on immigration?
Updated by Dara Lind on November 20, 2014, 12:29 p.m. ET


Obama's immigration inspiration?   

President Obama's supporters are justifying his coming executive action on immigration by turning to an unlikely argument: Bush did it.

No, not that Bush.

They're pointing to a program started by President Reagan, and expanded by President George H. W. Bush, that ultimately targeted over a third of the country's unauthorized immigrants for protection from deportation. It was called the Family Fairness Program and it's probably the closest analogue in recent presidential history to what Obama is considering now. Here's how it worked.

more here:
http://www.vox.com/2014/11/20/7254361/family-fairness-immigration

====== AND here:

Reagan And Bush Made The Same Immigration Move That Has The GOP Enraged At Obama
Associated Press    Andrew Taylor, Associated Press    Nov. 17, 2014, 10:07 AM

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Barack Obama's anticipated order that would shield millions of immigrants now living illegally in the U.S. from deportation is not without precedent.

Two of the last three Republican presidents — Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush — did the same thing in extending amnesty to family members who were not covered by the last major overhaul of immigration law in 1986.

There was no political explosion then comparable to the one Republicans are threatening now.

A tea party-influenced GOP is poised to erupt if and when Obama follows through on his promise. He wants to extend protection from deportation to millions of immigrant parents and spouses of U.S. citizens and permanent residents, and expand his 2-year-old program that shields immigrants brought illegally to this country as children.

"The audacity of this president to think he can completely destroy the rule of law with the stroke of a pen is unfathomable to me," said GOP Rep. Steve King of Iowa, an outspoken opponent of relaxing U.S. immigration law. "It is unconstitutional, it is cynical, and it violates the will of the American people."

Such strong feelings are common among congressional Republicans. GOP leaders warn that an executive order from Obama would "poison the well" and severely damage Republicans' willingness to work with the president during his final two years in office.

Some Republicans have even raised the possibility of impeachment.

Nearly three decades ago, there was barely a peep when Reagan and Bush used their authority to extend amnesty to the spouses and minor children of immigrants covered by the 1986 law.

In 1986, Congress and Reagan enacted a sweeping overhaul that gave legal status to up to 3 million immigrants without authorization to be in the country, if they had come to the U.S. before 1982. Spouses and children who could not meet that test did not qualify, which incited protests that the new law was breaking up families.

Early efforts in Congress to amend the law to cover family members failed. In 1987, Reagan's Immigration and Naturalization Service commissioner announced that minor children of parents granted amnesty by the law would get protection from deportation.

Spouses and children of couples in which one parent qualified for amnesty but the other did not remained subject to deportation, leading to efforts to amend the 1986 law.

In a parallel to today, the Senate acted in 1989 to broaden legal status to families but the House never took up the bill. Through the INS, Bush advanced a new "family fairness" policy that put in place the Senate measure. Congress passed the policy into law by the end of the year as part of broader immigration legislation.

"It's a striking parallel," said Mark Noferi of the pro-immigration American Immigration Council. "Bush Sr. went big at the time. He protected about 40 percent of the unauthorized population. Back then that was up to 1.5 million. Today that would be about 5 million."

But a lawyer who worked on the 1986 law and the 1990 follow-up as an aide to then-Sen. Alan Simpson, R-Wyo., said Bush's action wasn't controversial because it came after lawmakers had made it clear they were going to tackle the issue.

That's not the case now.

"Bush Sr. took the action that he did but it wasn't as if Congress was legislating anything to the contrary," said Carl Hampe of Fragomen, Del Rey, Bernsen & Loewy. "What's different now is that there is no clear path to legislative relief for the class of beneficiaries for which the president's order would provide relief."

Obama's announcement could come as early as this coming week and cover as many as 5 million people. Like Bush, Obama is expected to extend deportation protections to families of U.S. citizens or permanent residents.

"It's clear that it's fully within his legal authority to issue these orders,"
said Rep. Joaquin Castro, D-Texas. He said Republicans 'didn't raise any objections in the past when Republican presidents issued similar orders. This is pure political theater."

Obama's anticipated action would not award legal status, but it would offer temporary protection from deportation and the possibility of obtaining a work permit.

"There's always some precedent for prosecutorial discretion," said Rep. Trent Franks, R-Ariz. "But this president would call tearing the Constitution into tiny little pieces in the White House prosecutorial discretion."


House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, is stopping short of threatening to use Congress' power of the purse to thwart any executive action by Obama. Boehner's priority is to avoid a government shutdown. But he made it clear that Republicans will make Obama pay a price if he carries out his threat.

"Every administration needs this and needs that, needs all kinds of things," Boehner said Thursday. "You know, if he wants to go off on his own, there are things that he's just not going to get."
Copyright (2014) Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

here:
http://www.businessinsider.com/reagan-and-bush-made-immigration-executive-orders-2014-11

===========================================








Wednesday, November 19, 2014

My Thoughts on the Michael Brown Shooting

It's become very clear after hearing the kinds of things I hear from people who think they understand what has happened that people really do not care about facts.

"His fingerprints are on the gun..."

"The shop owner should have shot 'em, would have been an open and shut case..."

The problem (other than the fact that Black people in this Free Nation have ALWAYS been disposable) is that the police shoot anyone they want on sight, and there's NOTHING we can do about it.

I'd like to point out a few things before I continue:

1) The CFR Controlled media is using the shooting of Michael Brown to push The Agenda

2) There are shootings that involve officers and unarmed black AND white people every day that you never hear about.
 
Here's one example that is not being spun by the CFR media:

Brother of fugitive killed by Salt Lake City police says he wasn't armed
By Bob Mims And Erin Alberty The Salt Lake Tribune
Published August 13, 2014 10:55 am

 A wanted fugitive fatally shot by Salt Lake City police, who were looking for a man reportedly brandishing a handgun outside a convenience store, was unarmed and trying to comply with police orders when he was killed, his brother claims.

Investigators, citing the ongoing nature of the investigation and need to protect evidence, remained mum on whether a gun was found at the scene of the Monday night shooting at a 7-Eleven store at 2102 S. State St. Police also would not discuss conflicting witness reports that Dillon Delbert Taylor, 20, appeared to have reached toward his waistband during the confrontation.

The Salt Lake Tribune on Wednesday submitted formal requests under the Government Records Access and Management Act for both the shooting incident report and the 911 call that purportedly led up to the confrontation.

Taylor was facing a felony arrest warrant when police challenged him outside the store, court records confirm. But Taylor's brother, 22-year-old Jerrail Pete Taylor — who court records show served time on a 2009 second-degree felony robbery count himself — insists that police did not mention the warrant when they approached him, his brother and a third man outside the store.

"We're walking out of the 7-Eleven with a drink, when the cops show up and start harassing us with guns," Jerrail Taylor told The Salt Lake Tribune Tuesday night. South Salt Lake police, who are investigating the shooting, said Salt Lake City police were answering a 911 call reporting a man there was waving a handgun; Dillon Taylor purportedly matched the description of the armed man.

more here:
http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/news/58287556-78/taylor-police-lake-salt.html.csp

This is a screenshot from Dillon Taylor's Facebook page: (before he was killed)



Dillon Taylor Facebook
https://www.facebook.com/dillon.taylor.33?fref=ts

UPDATE:

DA says Dillon Taylor officer-involved killing was justified
By Erin Alberty And Marissa Lang The Salt Lake Tribune
Published October 1, 2014 1:27 pm

Dillon Taylor was not armed when a Salt Lake City police officer shot him to death outside a convenience store.

But in that moment on Aug. 11, Officer Bron Cruz had good reason to think Taylor was pulling a gun out of his pants, Salt Lake County District Attorney Sim Gill ruled on Tuesday.

Taylor, 20, and the two men he was with matched the descriptions of a 911 caller who said three men had "flashed" a gun. And Cruz saw them "making a scene" on their way to the 7-Eleven near 2100 S. State Street.

Confronted by officers, the two men with Taylor held up their hands, while Taylor alone was "noncompliant."

Body-cam video shows that Taylor turned toward officers with his hands in his pants before hoisting his shirt — a gesture officers are trained to recognize as a possible weapon-draw.

"Nothing that Mr. Taylor did assisted in de-escalating the situation," Gill said. "If anything, it escalated things."

Taylor's shooting was justified, Gill said, not because he posed an actual threat, but because Cruz reasonably perceived a threat.

"Officer Cruz's belief that Dillon Taylor was armed with a gun and intended to use it against the officers was reinforced by Dillon's actions and the acts of others," Gill wrote in a letter to Salt Lake City Police Chief Chris Burbank. "By the time Dillon drew his hands from his waistband, Officer Cruz's belief that Dillon was presenting a weapon [and ... would use the weapon against officers] was reasonable."

more here:
http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/news/58472404-78/taylor-cruz-hands-gill.html.csp

Video:


=================================================

Why were these two men shot and killed on the scene while unarmed?

Dillon Taylor:




Michael Brown:



The Micael Brown Timeline:
http://www.vox.com/cards/mike-brown-protests-ferguson-missouri/mike-brown-ferguson-MO-protests

Yet, these two were armed to the teeth, still living and breathing?



Timeline: Colorado Movie Theater Massacre
July 20, 2012
By JENNIFER ABBEY

Thousands of eager fans flocked to movie theaters across the country Thursday evening to see the premiere of the new film "The Dark Knight Rises."

But shortly after the movie began at the Century 16 Theater in Aurora, Colo., 24-year-old James Holmes allegedly entered the theater and opened fire, shooting a total of 71 people. Twelve people were killed and 59 were injured.

here:
http://abcnews.go.com/US/timeline-colorado-movie-theater-massacre/story?id=16824539&singlePage=true



Cliven Bundy:
http://globalistnews.blogspot.com/search?q=cliven+bundy

I'd like to note that Cliven Bundy is STILL A FREE MAN AFTER STEALING MONEY FOR 20 YEARS AND THREATENING FEDERAL OFFICERS!!!!

=================================================

The police arrived on the scene ready to beat this black man, why?

Exclusive: Dashcam video clears NJ man
Sarah Wallace has the Eyewitness News exclusive.
February 21, 2014 5:01:35 PM PST
http://7online.com/archive/9440401/

Don't White People Kill Each Other, Too?
And yet we keep hearing about black-on-black crime because it fits the false media narrative.
BY: EDWARD WYCKOFF WILLIAMS
Posted: April 10 2012 12:40 AM
http://www.theroot.com/articles/culture/2012/04/whiteonwhite_crime_it_goes_against_the_false_media_narrative.html

I would go into a long explaination of the race implications, but I really don't feel like it. I've covered race before:

You Don’t Have To Apologize For Being White (and no one is asking you to)
http://globalistnews.blogspot.com/2014/07/you-dont-have-to-apologize-for-being.html

It's too late now.

As long as it was not happening to you, (and by you I mean white people) nothing was going on.

No one listened to black people back in the day when we tried to tell you that the police state was rising.

Now, we all have to deal with it.

Thank God his Kingdom is coming...

-SpydaT3K


Monday, November 17, 2014

My Reaction when I hear about the Michael Brown case




Missouri Gov. Jay Nixon declares a state of emergency ahead of an expected grand jury decision in the Michael Brown case. http://cnn.it/1qfK2T3

the comments:
https://www.facebook.com/cnn/photos/a.369810096508.159795.5550296508/10153067313826509/?type=1

When it comes down to it, it's Babylonians acting like Babylonians.
This is why we need the Kingdom of God.

We can't vote away sin/corruption...
-SpytdaT3K

You ever wonder what the Globalist are discussing?

The same things I've been posting on this blog.

How will the second machine age affect jobs?
By Dalia Marin Nov 17 2014

machines-technology-jobs-628x330

In a famous book, the two economists Erik Brynjolfsson and Andrew McAfee from MIT describe how recent advances in artificial intelligence are changing our lives: driverless cars, drones for package delivery, computer programs to diagnose illnesses, intelligent pattern recognition software that replaces lawyers, 3D printing, etc (Brynjolfsson and McAfee 2014). They call these developments the ‘second machine age’.

In this column, I want to discuss two hypotheses of how the second machine age may affect the world we live in.

    Hypothesis 1. Robots will bring manufacturing back to the rich countries as machines are replacing workers and the cost of labour will not matter much.
    Hypothesis 2. Intelligent machines will replace smart people rather than increase the demand for skills (capital bias rather than skill bias technical change) and as a result the relative price for skills (the skill premium) will decline.

The revival of manufacturing in rich economies

Let me start with the first hypothesis. Anecdotal evidence of reshoring (the relocation of activity back from the low-wage countries to the high-wage countries) is mounting. Apple is shifting back some of the activity from Foxconn China to Silicon Valley in California; Airtex Design Group is shifting part of its textile production from China back to the US (see New York Times 2013). In a recent survey by the management consultancy PricewaterhouseCoopers among 384 firms in the Eurozone, two-thirds said they had reshored some activities during the past 12 months and 50% plan to do so in the next 12 months.

the data, here:
http://forumblog.org/2014/11/how-will-the-second-machine-age-affect-jobs/

===================================

Robot Brains Catch Humans in 25 Years, Then Speed Right On By
By Tom Randall Nov 10, 2014 1:43 PM CT


An android Repliee S1, produced by Japan's Osaka University professor Hiroshi Ishiguro, performing during a dress rehearsal of Franz Kafka's "The Metamorphosis." Phototographer: Yoshikazu Tsuno/AFP via Getty Images

We’ve been wrong about these robots before.

Soon after modern computers evolved in the 1940s, futurists started predicting that in just a few decades machines would be as smart as humans. Every year, the prediction seems to get pushed back another year. The consensus now is that it’s going to happen in ... you guessed it, just a few more decades.

There’s more reason to believe the predictions today. After research that’s produced everything from self-driving cars to Jeopardy!-winning supercomputers, scientists have a much better understanding of what they’re up against. And, perhaps, what we’re up against.

Nick Bostrom, director of the Future of Humanity Institute at Oxford University, lays out the best predictions of the artificial intelligence (AI) research community in his new book, “Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies.” Here are the combined results of four surveys of AI researchers, including a poll of the most-cited scientists in the field, totalling 170 respondents.



Human-level machine intelligence is defined here as “one that can carry out most human professions at least as well as a typical human.”

By that definition, maybe we shouldn’t be so surprised about these predictions. Robots and algorithms are already squeezing the edges of our global workforce. Jobs with routine tasks are getting digitized: farmers, telemarketers, stock traders, loan officers, lawyers, journalists -- all of these professions have already felt the cold steel nudge of our new automated colleagues.

Replication of routine isn't the kind of intelligence Bostrom is interested in. He’s talking about an intelligence with intuition and logic, one that can learn, deal with uncertainty and sense the world around it. The most interesting thing about reaching human-level intelligence isn’t the achievement itself, says Bostrom; it’s what comes next. Once machines can reason and improve themselves, the skynet is the limit.

Computers are improving at an exponential rate. In many areas -- chess, for example -- machine skill is already superhuman. In others -- reason, emotional intelligence -- there’s still a long way to go. Whether human-level general intelligence is reached in 15 years or 150, it’s likely to be a little-observed mile marker on the road toward superintelligence.

Superintelligence: one that “greatly exceeds the cognitive performance of humans in virtually all domains of interest.”



Inventor and Tesla CEO Elon Musk warns that superintelligent machines are possibly the greatest existential threat to humanity. He says the investments he's made in artificial-intelligence companies are primarily to keep an eye on where the field is headed.

“Hope we’re not just the biological boot loader for digital superintelligence,” Musk Tweeted in August. “Unfortunately, that is increasingly probable.”

There are lots of caveats before we prepare to hand the keys to our earthly kingdom over to robot offspring. First, humans have a terrible track record of predicting the future. Second, people are notoriously optimistic when forecasting the future of their own industries. Third, it’s not a given that technology will continue to advance along its current trajectory, or even with its current aims.

Still, the brightest minds devoted to this evolving technology are predicting the end of human intellectual supremacy by midcentury. That should be enough to give everyone pause. The direction of technology may be inevitable, but the care with which we approach it is not.

“Success in creating AI would be the biggest event in human history,” wrote theoretical physicist Stephen Hawking, in an Independent column in May. “It might also be the last.”


here:
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-11-10/robot-brains-catch-humans-in-25-years-then-speed-right-on-by.html




Sunday, November 16, 2014

White Supremecy...the joke is on them


White Supremacists Protest in Rockwall
Yes. It's 2014. White supremacists are protesting in downtown Rockwall. There was a counter protest by Anonymous too. Danny Fulgencio was there for photos 1-27, and Dylan Hollingsworth for 27-43.
Published on November 10, 2014
http://www.dallasobserver.com/slideshow/white-supremacists-protest-in-rockwall-42033398/



Tempers flare as white supremacists protest in Rockwall
Jenny Doren, WFAA 3:46 p.m. CST November 10, 2014

ROCKWALL – One planned protest in Rockwall turned into so much more as dozens of people came out on both sides of a hot button issue.

Police in riot gear stood guard Saturday evening as white supremacists rallied on the steps of the county courthouse against illegal immigration.

Families watched on in disbelief.

"I would think this would be back in the segregation days," said Tori Glass, a mother of three. "I'm just in shock. I would never [have] thought this was still going on."


Linda Santiso has lived in Rockwall since 1979. She said seeing Ku Klux Klan members flying neo-Nazi flags was a first for her too.

"I just see the division that's in the country being expressed here in my hometown and it's very sad,"
she said.

The National Socialist Party called their gathering a "show of force." The group gathered to speak out against illegal immigration, violent drug lords and in defense of the "American way of life,"

Several other groups, including Anonymous North Texas, the New Black Panthers, Occupy Dallas and Open Carry Texas, also gathered outside the courthouse to counter protest.

video and more here:
http://www.wfaa.com/story/news/local/2014/11/09/white-supremacists-immigration-rockwall/18753325/

=================================================

What they don't know:


 "Anyone who interprets National Socialism merely as a political movement knows almost nothing about it. It is more than religion; it is the determination to create a new man."
--Hitler

"I learned much from the Order of the Jesuits", said Hitler... "Until now, there has never been anything more grandiose, on the earth, than the hierarchical organization of the Catholic Church. I transferred much of this organization into my own party... I am going to let you in on a secret... I am founding an Order... In my "Burgs" of the Order, we will raise up a youth which will make the world tremble... Hitler then stopped, saying that he couldn't say any more.." Hermann Rauschning, former national-socialist chief of the government of Dantzig: "Hitler m'a dit", (Ed. Co-operation, Paris 1939, pp.266, 267, 273 ss).

Catholic Church and Nazi Germany

Pius XI (1922–39) and Pius XII (1939–58) led the Roman Catholic Church through the rise and fall of Nazi Germany. In the 1930s, Catholics constituted a third of the population of Germany and "Political Catholicism" was a major force in the interwar Weimar Republic. Prior to 1933, Catholic leaders denounced Nazi doctrines while Catholic regions generally did not vote Nazi. Though hostility between the Nazi Party and the Catholic Church was real, the Nazi Party first developed in largely Catholic Munich, where many Catholics, lay and clerical, offered enthusiastic support.[1]

Raised a Catholic, Hitler retained some regard for the organisational power of the Catholic church, but had utter contempt for its central teachings which, he said, if taken to their conclusion "would mean the systematic cultivation of the human failure".[48] Hitler was aware Bismarck's kulturkampf of the 1870s was defeated by the unity of Catholics behind the Centre Party and was convinced Nazism could only succeed if Political Catholicism, and its democratic networks, were eliminated.[29][49][50] Important conservative elements, such as the officer corps, opposed Nazi persecution of the churches.[51][52]

sources here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catholic_Church_and_Nazi_Germany

=================================================

The Jesuits are playing games here, they are everywhere.

Ron Paul on Gold - April 23, 2013

He predicted Gold would go up, and that he would buy more in 2013:




Where's his Go(l)d now?