There are so many Isms in the world, it's mind boggling.
I found this rather large list:
Philosophical Isms
"Here are 234 different isms, each representing a philosophical, political or moral doctrine or a belief system. In selecting terms for the list, I have deliberately avoided any word which apply ism to a personal name, so that Marxism doesn't count although it is otherwise an ideal candidate for the list. I also excluded isms which do not refer to a specific belief system, such as impressionism (an artistic movement) or alcoholism (a disease). Despite these omissions, enough remain to leave an ism in every pot, including beliefs about proper government, God, and the nature of existence itself. Of the terms on the list that are of a religious nature, most are Christian, which is not unexpected, but I'm open to adding isms from other world religions."
> I'll list a few of these:
anarchism doctrine that all governments should be abolished
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarchism
adoptionism belief that Christ was the adopted and not natural son of God
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adoptionism
autotheism belief that one is God incarnate or that one is Christ
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autotheism
diphysitism belief in the dual nature of Christ
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diophysitism
ditheletism doctrine that Christ had two wills
and
monophysitism belief that Christ was primarily divine but in human form
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ditheletism
kenotism doctrine that Christ rid himself of divinity in becoming human
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenotism
monotheletism belief that Christ had only one will
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monotheletism
psilanthropism denial of Christ's divinity
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psilanthropism
ubiquitarianism belief that Christ is everywhere
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ubiquitarians
conservatism belief in maintaining political and social traditions:
"Edmund Burke, an 18th-century politician who opposed the French Revolution but supported the American Revolution, is credited as one of the main theorists of conservatism in Great Britain in the 1790s"
more here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservatism
more "Isms" here:
http://phrontistery.info/isms.html
================================================
Someone who believes we should vote and resist tyranny, sent me this:
"All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good people to do nothing."
--Edmund Burke
my simple reply to this person:
"Jesus answered, My kingdom is not of this world: if my kingdom were of this world, then would my servants fight, that I should not be delivered to the Jews: but now is my kingdom not from hence. "
--John 18:36
I said nothing else after that, and I received no reply to that scripture.
Oh, there's just one problem with that Edmund Burke quote, he never said that.
http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Edmund_Burke#Disputed
He was also a Freemason, two sources confirm the first:
1) The Freemasons: A History of the World's Most Powerful Secret Society By Jasper Godwin Ridley
larger: http://i.imgur.com/LwJhjpq.png
found here:
http://tinyurl.com/p8suv5j
2) Edmund Burke Author, Orator, Political Theorist, Philosopher and Freemason.
http://www.irishmasonichistory.com/edmund-burke-author-orator-political-theorist-philosopher-and-freemason.html
Statue in Washington, D.C.
Edmund Burke by James Northcote
3) Jerusalem Lodge No. 44, Clerkenwell, London
January 12, 1729 Ð July 9, 1797
"Toleration is good for all or it is good for none."
http://freemasonry.bcy.ca/biography/burke_e/burke_e.html
So, every freedom fighter on the Internet is quoting a Freemason and does not even realize it.
================================================
> I'm just going to drop this in the middle of my rant...
THE STATE REPUBLICAN PARTY IN TEXAS IS NOW THE CRAZIEST IN AMERICA
By Charles P. Pierce on July 7, 2014
If you want to see the clearest symptoms of the prion disease that has devoured the brain of the Republican party, the state Republican party is your Patient Zero. And, before a whole bunch of people in the Beltway media playpen begin minimizing this craziness because it pretty much shatters the whole idea of Both Sides Doing It without which most of those people can't get out of bed in the morning. This isn't four guys in camo in Idaho. This isn't a guy broadcasting on a short-wave from upper Michigan, or receiving the truth about chemtrails and the Illuminati through his teeth. This is the Republican party representing the state from which he got our last Republican president, and one of the biggest states in the Union. This is what it believes, as summed up with realit-based parentheticals by Hendrik Hertzberg at The New Yorker:
"Let's proceed to policy. In the next of its forty pages, the platform demands, among other things: That the Texas Legislature should nullify-indeed, "ignore, oppose, refuse, and nullify"-federal laws it doesn't like. (Unmentioned is the fact that, beginning in 1809, the Supreme Court has steadfastedly rejected state nullification of federal laws.); That when it comes to "unelected bureaucrats"-i.e., pretty much the entire federal work force above the janitorial level-Congress should "defund and abolish these positions."; That the Seventeenth Amendment, which was adopted in 1913, be repealed, so that "the appointment of United States Senators" can again be made by state legislators, not by voters. (Admittedly, the Texas Legislature could hardly do worse.), That all federal "enforcement activities" within the borders of Texas-including, presumably, the activities of F.B.I. agents, Justice Department prosecutors, air marshals, immigration officers, agricultural inspectors, and tax auditors-"must be conducted under the auspices of the county sheriff with jurisdiction in that county."
Keep an eye on that last sentence. The Republican party of the state of Texas, a state which has 38 electoral votes and which will send 153 delegates to the 2016 Republican National Convention, has endorsed the exact theory of government that was promulgated by the gun-toting yahoos at the Bundy Ranch. And there's more.
"...there are plenty of things that Texas Republicans plan to do away with entirely-or, to use their preferred word, things they would subject to "abolishment." (For Calhoun conservatives, I suppose, "abolition" has regrettable overtones.) A partial list: Personal-income taxes; Property taxes; Estate taxes; Capital-gains taxes; Franchise and business-income taxes; The gift tax; Minimum-wage laws; Social Security ("We support an immediate and orderly transition to a system of private pensions"); The Environmental Protection Agency;The Department of Education and all its functions; "Unelected bureaucrats"; "Any and all federal agencies not based on an enumerated power granted by the United States Federal Constitution"; Congressional pensions; Supreme Court jurisdiction in cases involving abortion, religious freedom, and the Bill of Rights; The Federal Reserve; "Foreign aid, except in cases of national defense or catastrophic disasters, with Congressional approval," Obamacare (but you knew that already)."
The Republican party of the state of Texas, a state that went for Mitt Romney by over two million votes, would like to do away with the Federal Reserve, and any Supreme Court jurisdiction in any case involving the Bill Of Rights. And, yes, there's more.
"Things that the Texas Republicans support: Withdrawal from the United Nations, the International Monetary Fund, the World Trade Organization, and the World Bank; "Traditional methods of discipline, including corporal punishment;" "Reducing taxpayer funding to all levels of education institutions," Returning to "the time-tested precious metal standard for the United States dollar." "
The Republican Party of the state of Texas, a state in which north of 45 percent of the voters identify as Republicans, would like to bring back spanking.
It seems almost pointless to mention this but there is simply no state Democratic party in any of the 50 states that is so clearly, obviously demented. This is the Republican Party. Yuval Levin and Ramesh Ponnuru are not. In fact, I think all those bold conservative thinkers of whom the New York Times thinks so much should bring their Big Ideas down to the next Texas state Republican convention and see how far they get. John Boehner, and Mitch McConnell, and especially obvious anagram Reince Priebus, who nominally presides over Bedlam, need to be asked every day which parts of the Texas Republican platform they support and which parts they don't. They don't get to use the crazies to get elected and then hide behind fake Washington politesse when the howls from the hinterlands get too loud. We allow ourselves only two major political parties. One of them is completely out of its fcking mind. This is a national problem.
here:
http://www.esquire.com/blogs/politics/Crazy_In_Texas
> ....oh, they are not done....
HISTORY GOES INTO RERUNS
By Charles P. Pierce on July 8, 2014
We had a peek yesterday into the lizard brain that drives the Texas Republican Party. It would be a mistake, however, to divorce the crazy from its proper historical antecedents. We would hate to accuse the Texas Republican Party of being made up of original thinkers or anything. Their ideas come from a long and proud American political history. We will put up something from the 2014 Texas Republican Party platform, and then we will pair it with something that presaged it rather accurately. For example:
A) We strongly urge the Texas Legislature ignore, oppose, refuse, and nullify any federal mandated legislation which infringes upon the states'10th Amendment Right. All federal enforcement activities in Texas must be conducted under the auspices of the county sheriff with jurisdiction in that county.
B) To regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian tribes; but neither this, nor any other clause contained in the Constitution, shall ever be construed to delegate the power to Congress to appropriate money for any internal improvement intended to facilitate commerce.
Or...
A) We, the 2014 Republican Party of Texas, believe in this platform and expect our elected leaders to uphold these truths through acknowledgement and action...We believe in:1.Strict adherence to the original intent of the Declaration of Independence and United States and Texas Constitutions...And we believe in "The laws of nature and nature's God" as our Founding Fathers believed.
B) We, the people ...each State acting in its sovereign and independent character, in order to form a permanent federal government, establish justice, insure domestic tranquillity, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity invoking the favor and guidance of Almighty God do ordain and establish this Constitution...
The A passages are from the Texas Republican platform.
The B passages are from the Constitution.
Of the Confederate States Of America.
Just sayin'
here:
http://www.esquire.com/blogs/politics/History_Goes_Into_Reruns
================================================
The Jesuits have been around since before this nation was even founded.
There's a really good breakdown of the hierarchy of control in Newswatch Magazine:
July 2014
The history of the papacy was 1,260 years long. The pope was captured in 1798 by a French general and died in prison. A new pope arose and the papacy is alive today.
People in the 1950-60’s were afraid of John F. Kennedy because he was a Catholic. They feared what the Pope and Catholic Church had done in Europe. Persecution and death reigned. Confiscation of so called heretics’ property took half the peoples property.
Today, the House of Representatives, the Senate, and courts are filled with secret Catholics and Jesuits. There are hundreds of Jesuits sponsored colleges to train young men to infiltrate our colleges, universities, political systems, etc.
The President of Harding University travelled the country lecturing about the Jesuits and Communism. Today, the Society of Jesus or Jesuits are stronger than ever.
The Pope had no entrance into America until President Ronald Reagan sent an Ambassador of America to Rome in 1984. Since then we find every fabric of society loaded with them. They are the military arm of the Vatican.
subscribe here:
http://www.newswatchmagazine.org/magazine/july-2014/
August 2014
Has idolatry, the worship of statues, ceased in the Catholic Church? Remember, within the first four of the Ten Commandments is the commandment NOT to commit idolatry, but the Catholic Church conveniently left it out and divided the Tenth Commandment into two parts to make it ten. The Second Council of Nicaea stated: “The Christians should not only serve and honor images, but adore and worship them” (Religion in America, p. 50, Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1968).
All pagan religions worship and bow to idols. Members of the Catholic Church say they are dealing with dead “saints.” In reality, they are worshipping the same pagan gods and goddesses of the occultists. After much research, historian Will Durant wrote: “Paganism survived…in the form of ancient rites and customs condoned, or accepted AND , by an often indulgent [Catholic] Church. And intimate and trustful worship of ; the Roman Lupercalia and the feast of purification of Isis became the Feast of the Nativity; the Saturnalia [and Brumalia - worship of Saturn as a god] were replaced by Christmas celebration…an ancient festival of the dead [was replaced] by All Souls Day, rededicated to Christian heroes; incense, lights, flowers, processions, vestments, hymns which had pleased the people in older cults were domesticated and cleansed in the ritual of the [Catholic] Church…soon people and priests would use the sign of the cross as a magic incantation to expel or drive away demons.”
“The Virgin [Mary] was given the title Queen of Heaven and is depicted wearing a blue robe decorated with stars and standing on a crescentmoon. This image is almost identical to pagan representations of the Goddess of Love, Ishtar, who was worshipped by the Babylonians. The statues of the Madonna holding the infant Jesus in her arms, which were erected in Catholic churches, are almost exact copies of the effigies of Isis suckling her baby Horus, found in Egyptian’s temples” (Michael Howard, The Occult Conspiracy: The Power of Secret Societies in World History [NY, NY: MFJ Books, 1989], p. 22).
Other proof of the PAGANISM of the Roman Catholic Church is: “Pagan gods were made Christian saints. A few examples are: Tammuz, the Hebrew form of the Accadian Tamzi, the sun god, and Dum-zi, became St. Thomas the Doubter.
From this tidbit of information, we can understand that the Catholic Church NEVER HAS BEEN CHRISTIAN.
NOTE: The Catholic inner, esoteric trinity is Father, Mother, Child. Which means they must elevate the female to the point of deity. Hence Mary being worshipped and Catholics having to go through Mary to get to Jesus.
subscribe here:
http://www.newswatchmagazine.org/magazine/august-2014/
================================================
What's my point?
I wrote up a blog:
Is this Christian?
http://globalistnews.blogspot.com/2014/06/is-this-christian.html
I'd like to clarify some stuff.
I've been reading various right-wing pages of the conservative/tea-party/republican/gop for one reason:
They claim to be us.
What do I mean by "us"?
They claim to be Christians while breaking his Law.
I did the same thing before God called me, so I speak from experience.
"But...but your mother and father, were they not Christian?"
> No, and they are still not.
> How can they be according to the Word:
Acts 5:32
And we are his witnesses of these things; and so is also the Holy Ghost, whom God hath given to them that obey him.
I Corinthians 5:8
Therefore let us keep the feast, not with old leaven, neither with the leaven of malice and wickedness; but with the unleavened bread of sincerity and truth.
Joshua 24:14
Now therefore fear the LORD, and serve him in sincerity and in truth: and put away the gods which your fathers served on the other side of the flood, and in Egypt; and serve ye the LORD.
Isaiah 8:20
To the law and to the testimony: if they speak not according to this word, it is because there is no light in them.
"But they mean well..."
> I "meant well", too. I still had to repent.
> See the Word mentioned above.
"Why post this blog?"
> I post this blog for those who out there that God called and might want some perspective on news.
The thing is, I hate being misrepresented, but that is bound to happen in Babylon.
I think it diminishes the calling when we are lumped in with those who are not called.
I don't believe in grey areas of anything, and I certainly do not believe there are 'lesser of two evils' in politics.
The left can claim the same thing and note every single wrong Bush did, and it still means nothing if they can't point out the wrong with their own party-politics.
Anyhow, it's been interesting, but I've seen no point in watching the right or the left, when the very globalist groups that are pushing the real agenda are on youtube talking about it.
I'm going to make a best effort to not post things that are not caught up in the paradigm.
and one more thing...
for those thinking:
"He must be liberal and doesn't know it."
> I was an Anarchist before conversion, because I didn't trust government.
I could not understand why voting never seem to change anything for the better, and now I know why.
Anarchism
"Anarchism is a political philosophy that advocates stateless societies often defined as self-governed voluntary institutions, but that several authors have defined as more specific institutions based on non-hierarchical free associations.
...
Jesus is sometimes considered the first anarchist in the Christian anarchist tradition. Georges Lechartier wrote that "The true founder of anarchy was Jesus Christ and...the first anarchist society was that of the apostles."
more here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarchism
We know Jesus Christ was not anti-government, because he has his own government coming, the Kingdom of God.
So, Georges Lechartier can go fly a kite in a thunderstorm with that non-sense.
There's no amount of money in the world that would make me resist tyranny, or become politically active or vote. Not when I'm being offered immortality and a place in God's perfect system.
...but hey, do you see the irony?
God called an Anarchist...LOL
There will be no Isms in the Kingdom of God, because they are all Man-Made.
Think about it.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.